The Arab Spring Exposed Absorbing Truths

The Land of Thirst by Eugéne Fromentin 

The Arab Spring has revealed some interesting truths.

North of Africa

In December 2010, the "Arab" Spring kicked off in Tunisia. The Tunisian revolution occurred; Ben Ali was toppled and soon afterwards Tunisians set sail towards the democratisation of their country (N.B: there has been a few bumps in the road, but Tunisia shows signs of being able to solve its issues).

In January 2011, Egyptians followed the Tunisian example and fought until they toppled Hosni Mubarak. Egypt hoped and believed to be walking on the path of democratisation, although several factors (mainly political immaturity on the part of the people) prevented a process similar to that of Tunisia's.

In February 2011, Libyans began fighting against Muammar Gaddafi. Libyan citizens organised themselves and asked the West for help (which they received). Gaddafi was eventually toppled and democracy was ushered into Libya (despite the constant radical Islamist attempts to destabilise the country).

Middle East

In January 2011, Yemeni nationals hit the streets determined to topple President Saleh. After much struggle against suppression they succeeded. A year and a month later, Yemenites elected their new president (curiously enough, the only electoral candidate).

In January 2011, Syrians went to the streets to protest against Bashar al-Assad; only to see their valid demands being hijacked by bigger political actors. Result: two years and two months later, what was thought to be a civil war, became an international war fought between Iran and Saudi Arabia (i.e. Shiites Vs Sunnis), at the expense of the common Syrian people (N.B: this blog does not advocate for a western intervention in Syria, for the reasons explained Here; nevertheless we do acknowledge the harm that both Iranian and Saudi proxies [Al-Assad forces and Al-Nusra respectively] are causing to Syrians).

In February 2011, Bahrain witnessed its version of the Arab Spring which was received with suppression and oppression. The people has not succeeded in reaching their goals.

So, what truths did the Arab Spring reveal after all? In a nutshell:

  1. North Africa and Middle East are two different regions with two different mind-sets (unlike what many political pundits would like to make us believe [since they always refers to North of Africa as ME - I would frankly like to see them justifying their geo-perversion]).
  2. Libyans and Tunisians, for instance, proved that it is possible for Muslims to speak out against radical Islamists, and to do whatever to prevent that lot from hijacking their nation.
  3. The establishment of the New Global Caliphate is not a universal Muslim ambition; since the majority in the Ummah just want to live their life in a free society, without having certain groups controlling their lives and telling them how to be Muslims.
  4. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not the centre-piece of the common Muslim thoughts and lives (note how the subject has been slowly losing its position in the list of Arab priorities).
  5. Some Muslim powers invest heavily in the destabilisation of the Middle East.
  6. The Muslim youth, in MENA, aspire to a Turkish model of democracy.
  7. Morocco and Jordan proved that Muslim monarchs can hearken their people's demands and quickly adjust themselves to democracy (i.e. to eventually become a modern, strong and long-lasting Constitutional Monarchy). 
The Arab Spring sifted the radical militants from the common peaceful citizen. Does it all seem like a big mess (especially when we look at Egypt and others)? Yes, it does; but the dust of revolutions take time to settle...Meanwhile, let's reflect on the truths it exposed.

Comments

  1. The Arab spring revealed an inconvenient truth: Muslim women are not that oppressed in a sense that most of them are content with their situation. For example in Egypt the Arab spring allowed women to wear the veil and have their own tv shows with veiled women reporting the news (in the Mubarak era they weren't allowed to do so). President Mursi's wife wants to be called "the Mother of Mohammed" and not by her own name or her title of first lady. Women feel now free to be "oppressed"...what are your thoughts on this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous :D!

      Muslim women are "content" with their situation, you say? I am not entirely sure of it; but if during the Mubarak rule women couldn't veil themselves, they now feel free to do so if they wish - is it bad? Believe it or not there are women who want to use a veil, a niqab, burka etc; what is reproachable is when politicians want to force everybody to cover themselves up, to use dark colours etc - that is oppression.

      Well, President Morsi's wife has the freedom to choose to be called whatever she likes...

      Anonymous, thank you so much for your sharing your opinion :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  2. Hmmm ... the truth is that general truths about the events that have been placed under the banner of "Arab Spring" will be hard to come by? But I think you are correct that most Muslims are more interested in just getting along with their lives than being militants.

    I have been under the general impression that demographics were driving Turkey via democracy towards an Islamic republic. But certainly Turks are much less Arab than the other Arabs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Looney :D!

      True; it will be hard to come by.

      Turks are not Arab at all; that's why Arabs are suspicious of them. Turkey has been trying to get the Arab League's sympathy but they know they have more chances with the West...still, they play an ambiguous game. Nevertheless, many in Muslim nations look at them and think "hey, it is possible to have an Islamic democracy after all!"...but let's see.

      Looney, thank you so much for your input :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  3. The Arab spring woke up sleeping monsters but isn't that what any revolution does? Now it is up to the Muslim revolutionaries to decide once and for all which road they will take: one of peace or one of militancy and constant turmoil?
    I just hope that Jordan does the right thing...if you catch my drift.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ana :D!

      Yes, that is what revolutions do. Indeed, they must choose which path they want to walk on.

      :) yes, I am catching your drift.

      Ana, thank you so much for your comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  4. I am tired of the media and their invited experts cause I feel like they all say the same things over and over again and again, with what purpose? Anyway, I just hope these guys get their act together cause honestly I am fed up, everyday news of terror, body counting, children suffering, silence and not knowing who I can trust whenever I see a muslim. Spring or no spring I just want them to get their act together. Sorry about the ranting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous :D!

      It's fine. I hope you let everything out of your chest :).
      Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  5. Max, by ignoring East of Yemen and the rest of the Islamic crescent, the world is behaving like an ostrich. The Afghanistan/Pakistan conundrum will have serious ramifications in the very near future. The Taliban is back on the ascendance and they are getting increasingly aggressive in both countries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rummy :D!

      Yep, burying their head in the sand - I agree with you.
      The Afghani/Pakistani issue has created serious ramifications decades ago; but we were slow to respond to the problem. Now, it will be harder to solve it; but it can be solved (if politicians have the testicular fortitude to change the way they do things).
      The Taliban seem to have used combat skills that the allied forces didn't expect them to: they improvised, modified, adapted and overcame. And the result is at sight: they are kicking butts again (with the help of Pakistan, of course).

      Rummy, thank you so much for your comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  6. I hope the shrillness of the words reach those for whom its intended. The problem is that their are vested interests at play who will want to play with emotions as as long as they can still it reaches a crescendo and these super-powerful fellows would love to keep their subjects in abject poverty and themselves loot the resources at the common mans expense. Yes, the irony is in all the arab uprising, it has fairly squared out with few gong about to be successful and a few who still will have a long way to go. Somewhere I do believe the western powers depending upon the mood of the nation and the common sentiment should strive to bring a parity in the affairs of the nations. Yes I know its a daunting task today considering the worlds largest economy today is the Red Dragon instead of the Big Brother, whose own state is a long as from democracy but still I just hope the people can create enough resistance and stand up to the oppression. Change is painful but inevitable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Kalyan :D!

      I hope so too ;).

      You know, I have a problem with political leaders who insist upon keeping their "subjects" in abject poverty. I do not believe in equality but I do not believe in keeping people in misery either - surely a balance can be met (and to meet it, we need ethics to prevail).

      The Red Dragon may not be the world's largest economy as many would like to believe it to be; last Sunday Fareed Zakaria showed why the Red Dragon will never surpass the Big Brother (who has mechanisms in place to make sure this won't happen so soon). Besides, the Red Dragon must implement a few steps before being even eligible to be compared to the Big Bros; know what I mean?

      True: change is painful but inevitable.

      Kalyan, thank you ever so much for your comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete

Post a Comment

Dissecting Society™ welcomes all sorts of comments, as we are strong advocates of freedom of speech; however, we reserve the right to delete Troll Activity; libellous and offensive comments (e.g. racist and anti-Semitic) plus those with excessive foul language. This blog does not view vulgarity as being protected by the right to free speech. Cheers

© 2007-2023 Dissecting Society™ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED