The French Arab Policy Vs Israeli Sovereignty



By Max Coutinho

Does the French Arab Policy still make sense? Should relevant countries still accommodate France’s special policy or has the time come to design a new one to counter the French? Because of this Arab Policy France has gotten away with almost every single evil it has done against non-Arab countries and peoples. Furthermore, the Élysée’s Arab Policy may have served as an instrument to aid and abet Terrorism.

What is the French Arab Policy?

Author: Charles de Gaulle, in 1967 after the Algerian War.
Original Name: Politique Arabe de France
Acronym: PAF
Objective: To counter-balance German's power (in Europe( and the Anglo-American alliance

PAF was conceived to establish deeper ties with Arab States - in the MENA region - and with authoritarian regimes in the broader Muslim World, in order to allow France to retain power and influence at "whatever price, even if it had damaging effects on the rest of the Western world" - according to Guy Millière – and as such, the Élysée offered itself to be the Arab world's voice in the International Community. The policy also consisted of cutting any strategic and military links between France and Israel - turning thus Paris into the main Western enemy of the Jewish state.

“In the early 1970s, France developed close ties with the PLO and became an ardent supporter of the ‘Palestinian cause.’ France used its influence, just two years after the massacre of Israeli athletes in Munich, to have Yasser Arafat invited to speak before the United Nations General Assembly in November 1974.” – Guy Milliére (in Here)

Conclusion: France’s Arab Policy turned the French State into a facilitator of Terrorism.

  • Is it by chance that most Hezbollah Financiers live in and move their funds through Paris?
  • Is it a coincidence that France is now re-entering Angola (the new Hezbollah HQ in Africa)?
  • Is it coincidental that the PLO runs freely in France and deposits their funds there too? 

There are no coincidences. France either reviews its Arab Policy or a precedent will be opened: a West-European State will be investigated and suffer Diplomatic Coercive Measures for sponsoring Terror, Corrosive Corruption, Gross Negligence of the Peoples of Africa and for doing Money Laundering (via their delightful banking system of late mentioned in every single shoddy business done in Africa and beyond).

The “Tomb of Kings”: A Question of Sovereignty

It has been reported that France has demanded Sovereignty over the Tomb of Kings located near the Old City of Jerusalem. (Source)

The catacomb has been under the administration of the French Consulate in the east Jerusalem for the past 150 years owing to international agreements dating back to the Ottoman period. – Israel Hayom

France ignores the San Remo Conference Resolution (a legally binding document under International Law) that clearly decided the "establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people" but now wants Israel to abide by an international agreement dating back to the Ottoman Period (that most certainly was rendered null and void upon the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire)? The Élysée is advised to forgo this illusion.

The Tomb of Kings is in Jerusalem, the Capital of the Jewish State; therefore, only the State of Israel has sovereignty over the Catacomb. But if the French insist on their demands, there won’t be any other option but to retaliate against the French State to the full extent of the Law. And before the French Establishment begins chuckling, and before the International Socialist begins designing plans to increase pressure on Israel, I beseech them to ask themselves the following question: full extent of the law or of the Law? There’s a stark difference between the two.

If France wants money, then perhaps it should just name its price: Private Jewish Groups are willing to pay. Or are we talking about politics (i.e. demand sovereignty over the tombs to later on pass that piece of land on to the Arabs)?

A Sound Advice about Things to Come

Moving from Words to Action…France chose to be Israel’s enemy, according to those who analyse the French Arab Policy – it’s in their right to do so. However, the House of David (that will soon be introduced to the world) has the right, and the duty, to protect the Land of Israel, the State of Israel and the People of Israel under One G-d.

Israel has for far too long put up with the world but now it’s over: the Jewish State is not for sale, it is not an international patch-work, it will never be divided into bits, it will not be shared and no Jew will be uprooted from the Promised Land ever again.

An Advice to Treacherous Jews

Let’s be straightforward: J-Street, New Israel Fund, Betzelem, Peace Now, Open Societies (ימח שמם); Anti-Eretz Yisrael Jews; Anti-Mashiach Jews; Anti-Semitic Jews and other Erev Rav shall be dealt with (ארור הגבר אשר יבטח באדם ומין יהוה יסור לבו). The House of David shall leave no stone unturned, and no amount of money and imaginary influence will prevent it.

'Fear not: for they that are with us are more than they that are with them.' – Elisha, 2 Kings 6:16

Service: we feel honoured to dedicate our lives to serve and implement His Plan. This is our Cause – DS Mission Statement for 2019 (link)

Conclusion

Charles de Gaulle designed PAF in 1967 and Jacques Chirac made the mistake of increasing its intensity; but that doesn’t mean that Emmanuel Macron has to make the same mistakes of the past – he can always change paths and do what is right for France. It is obvious that the PAF did more harm than good to the French, so why not deviate from it? Old formulas do not work in a changing world; and Monsieur Macron or the French establishment cannot stop the wave of change. They simply can’t, even though they try very hard – an effort we respect.

France takes care of its own interests, as any sovereign country should; however, the Jewish State is way above the Knesset and PM Netanyahu, so its interests are above anything anyone can think of. Israel is a 5,779 year Project and she will stand.

Europe is invited to leave our country, the Jewish State. The Catholic Church is invited to drop its perfidy. And the world is invited to understand that Jerusalem is not the Capital of three religions: it is the Capital of Judaism. Maktub...

[The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dissecting Society™ . © 2007-2019 Author(s) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED]

Comments

  1. France has got some nerve: sovereignty over a site in other people's country? ארור צפרת

    ReplyDelete
  2. "France blasts Israel for kicking observers out of Hevron"
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/258625

    France seems to be all over the place, doesn't she? Sometimes the right words come out of her mouth but she remains our main foe in Europe. I don't trust the French and I suspect that one of these days we will have to rescue her again!

    ReplyDelete
  3. What started as a policy to counter Germany and the Anglo-American axis ended up a policy of appeasement. And what did France gain from it? +6 million Muslims and no-go zones! Does France think it was worth it? Israel must stand her ground now and forever!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The French still believe in the 'Palestinian cause' but little do they know that that cause if dead. In any case, it will be a pleasure to finally meet the House of David :-). ב"ה

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cursed be anyone who curses Israel!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nothing worse than the self-hating Jew! But I take satisfaction in knowing that Macron is about to fall! Any time now! It's time these fuckers understand that if they mess with Israel they suffer the consequences, dudes!! Max, I am curious about that House of David! Are there any hot chicks?

    ReplyDelete
  7. France will pay, G-d will see to it! ב"ה
    All of Israel belongs to the Jewish People, including Samaria and Judea!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Dissecting Society™ welcomes all sorts of comments, as we are strong advocates of freedom of speech; however, we reserve the right to delete Troll Activity; libellous and offensive comments (e.g. racist and anti-Semitic) plus those with excessive foul language. This blog does not view vulgarity as being protected by the right to free speech. Cheers

© 2007-2023 Dissecting Society™ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED